Here's my comments:
What O'Brien was charged with IS a crime. It is spelled out very simply in the Municipal Elections Act when they sign up as a candidate.
Influence peddling is a crime but what exact influence did O'Brien have. You had a horrendously unqualified individual who had no business even being considered for a position on the parole board and if you listened to the evidence it was actually Kilrea who brought up the appointment not O'Brien. He said well, we'll see or maybe you can call the Feds yourself and I'll give you the number. I don't see any influence there. Now, if it was determined that O'Brien called up Baird and said listen we need this dude out of the race so I can win and Baird offers him something...voila crime. That never came even close to happening. If what he did was a crime then as someone said earlier better start building a prison the size of Toronto to house all the you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours later on political moves. (IE: Belinda Stronach accepting offer to move across the aisle for a nice cushy cabinet post....David Emerson in reverse....Now someone brokered those deals...now that is a crime..throw them in jail)
While O'Brien was under no obligation to testify,
The wheels were off this case the moment Edelson started to cross examine Kilrea. Dates were wrong, meetings were wrong, recollection was wrong...everything was wrong. Why would O'Brien need to testify. They had already entered his police interview as evidence so what more could he offer.
Contrary to another poster claiming that Council will be disappointed that the Mayor was acquitted since they were getting their robes fitted, I am not sure that was the case
Doucet stated a few days before the verdict that "Why hold another election for mayor because as we know the last eight months of any council is lame-duck so why not just appoint someone for the next 7 months and spare the costs."
However, I will say that I was impressed with how much Council got done while the Mayor was on leave. hmmmm.....don't think it hurt Council much to have their so-called leader off at trial.
You really must warn me when your going to say stuff like this. Need to clean coffee off screen now. I actually heard a reporter say the same thing yesterday, not sure who, and the other person on the panel asked the same question that I'm going to ask you now. What exactly did they accomplish other than not being cantankerous and crying about what a big Meany pants that O'Brien is. She couldn't list one thing of any substance either This council was useless before and is useless today and will be useless tomorrow. Nothing will change with O'Brien coming back as the only thing that may come out of this is it may keep some focus on council for the next 15 months so when people go to the ballot box next time they make the 'real change' this city needs. Don't care if this involves O'Brien or not just wipe the slate clean and start afresh with a brand new councillors and possibly a brand new mayor...some people we've never seen before. Now that would be impressive to me.